Stories in Puranas and why analogy is used
SB 4.28.65-My dear King Prācīnabarhi, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the cause of all causes, is celebrated to be known indirectly. Thus I have described the story of Purañjana to you. Actually it is an instruction for self-realization.
PURPORT–There are many similar stories in the purāṇas for self-realization. As stated in the Vedas: parokṣa-priyā iva hi devāḥ. There are many stories in the Purāṇas that are intended to interest ordinary men in transcendental subjects, but actually these refer to real facts. They are not to be considered stories without a transcendental purpose. Some of them refer to real historical facts. One should be interested, however, in the real purport of the story. Indirect instruction is quickly understandable for a common man. Factually the path of bhakti-yoga is the path of hearing directly about the pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead (śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ [SB 7.5.23]), but those who are not interested in hearing directly about the activities of the Lord, or who cannot understand them, can very effectively hear such stories and fables as this one narrated by Nārada Muni.
July 16 1976 NY press interview
Prabhupāda: It is always separated. It is always separated. Just like the driver and the car, they are always separated.
Interviewer: I’m talking about the movement, from the secular world.
Prabhupāda: First of all, understand the analogy. The car and the driver is always separated. The driver is not car, neither the car is the driver.
Interviewer: Well, is the Kṛṣṇa movement the driver or the car?
Prabhupāda: Why you bring Kṛṣṇa? First of all, try to understand the analogy. There is car and there is the driver. That car is always different from the driver and the driver is always different from the car. Is it not?
Interviewer: Absolutely. The car can’t drive itself.
Prabhupāda: So, if you take attention of the car and you do not know anything about the driver, then what is your knowledge?
Interviewer: I didn’t quite get the question.
Oct 21 1975 letter
Concerning our use of analogy. We do not bring in imperfect analogy, but we follow the instructions of the Sastras strictly. Our authority is on the basis of Sastra, not analogy. So, Vyasadeva while giving the history of creation says “Janmadyasya . . . adhikavaye” . . . so He impregnated the heart of Brahma with all the designs of creation. So what is wrong there? If I instruct someone you do like this, and he does it, then what is the difficulty? This is the system. Our authority is sastra. We give analogy for the general mass of people who have no faith in sastra. Analogy is not proof; sastra is proof. Foolish people cannot understand or accept, so we use analogy. The conclusion is not drawn from the analogy but from the sastra. We don’t use a combination of logic and authority, we use authority. Logic we use to convince someone who doesn’t accept the authority. The basic principle is authority. Vedas say that cowdung is pure and we accept it.There is no logic, but when we practically use it we see that it is correct. The logic of using analogy is called in the sastra “sakha candra nyaya.” It is easier to focus on the moon through the branches of a tree. The moon is great distance away, and you say that it is just through the branches. So you can focus more easily on the moon because 2 points joined make a straight line. So focusing on the nearby object helps us to focus on the far-away object. This is the use of analogy.
Some Conclusions-The above two items show why preaching to light headed individuals sometimes requires the use of stories from the Vedas or the use of analogy. We can see in the press interview, the reporter still didn’t quite understand what Srila Prabhupada was talking about, even though he was making it quite simple with the car/body example.
Similarly when discussing things with devotees, even we, who are supposed to be endowed with some of the best intelligence of the human masses, still , sometimes, cant understand the points trying to be made. This can be due to many personal and psychological factors. And, when personal motivation enters ones consciousness, this makes it impossible to understand subtle spiritual truths. One should be so open minded he or she can accept truth wherever or from whomever they find it. This ability requires that one be serious, sincere and above all, have the blessings of God-Krsna. Therefore when one gets some mercy or blessing from Krsna, and doesnt accept it as mercy, or just cant understand it as mercy, then that individual, according to Srila Prabhupada, is going against the sastra. See proof below…..
Sept 21 1970 letter....In my books I have tried to explain clearly this simultaneously one and different philosophy acinta beda beda tattva propounded by Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu. But sometimes it happens that this philosophy is given a self-interested interpretation. As soon as personal motivation comes in it is not possible for one to understand our Krishna Consciousness philosophy.
Sept 26 1972 LA lecture….Just like Cāṇakya, in his moral lessons, he says that viṣād apy amṛtaṁ grāhyam. When there is a tub of poison, but, if there is little nectar, then you take it. Don’t think that “It is in the poison pot, why shall I take it?” No, you can take it. Viṣād apy amṛtaṁ grāhyam amedhyād api kāñcanam. Suppose in a very filthy place where people pass stool, urine, there is some gold. So you should take it. Don’t think that because the gold is in the polluted place, gold has become polluted. No. You take it. Viṣād apy amṛtaṁ grāhyam amedhyād api kāñcanam, nīcād apy uttamā vidyā. Vidyā, education, was to be received from a brāhmaṇa, because it was the brāhmaṇa’s business to become highly learned scholar and make others educated. Teacher’s business was entrusted to the brāhmaṇas, administration to the kṣatriyas, production to the vaiśya, and labor to the śūdra. So because generally we have to take education from highly learned brāhmaṇa, but if a person born in low family, he has got some talent, education, so don’t hesitate. Take from him. Not that, “Oh, he is low born. Why shall I take education from him?” No. The śāstra says, “No, you can take. It doesn’t matter. He has got the learning. You take that. Make him a teacher.” Nīcād apy uttamā vidyā strī-ratnaṁ duṣkulād api. Strī-ratnam. If a girl is very qualified, beautiful, even she is born of a low family, you can accept her. This is the injunction of the śāstras.
Hare Krsna
damaghosa das
Our beautiful Sri Sri Gaura and Nitai