Submitted by: Yasoda nandana Dasa
“So unless one is self-realized, there is practically no use writing about Krsna. This transcendental writing does not depend on material education. It depends on the spiritual realization. You’ll find, therefore, in the comments of Bhagavatam by different acaryas, even there are some discrepancies, they are accepted as asat-patha. It should remain as it is.”
Submitted by Damagosha Dasa
Seattle 0ct 7 1968
Just like the other evening one boy was questioning, “Why should we bow down?” I do not know if he’s present here. The bow down to surrender to somebody is not bad, but because we are in a different situation, by surrendering to other, it is very uncomfortable. Just like nobody wants to be dependent on other nation, nobody wants to be dependent on other people. Everyone wants to be independent, because this material world is perverted reflection of the spiritual world. But in the spiritual world, the more you surrender, the more you are servant, you are happy. You are happy. But we have no such understanding at the present moment. We have no spiritual idea, no spiritual realization; therefore we shudder as soon as we hear that we have to become servant of God. But there is no question of shuddering. It is very pleasant to become servant of God. You see so many reformers, they came, they served the mission of God, and they are still worshiped. So to become servant of God, servitor of God, is not very insignificant thing. It is the most important thing. Govindam ādi–puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi. But don’t accept it. First of all try to understand. Therefore Vedānta–sūtra says, athāto brahma jijñāsā. Try to understand what is Brahman. Try to understand what is Brahman and try to understand your relationship. And then, when you actually surrender, you’ll feel your eternal blissful life, full of knowledge.
…Because we have been accustomed in our present conditional life to revolt against surrender. There are so many parties, so many “isms,” and the main principle is that “Why shall I surrender?” That is the main disease. Whatever political party is there… Just like the Communist party. Their revolt is against the superior authority they call capitalists. “Why shall we…” Everywhere, the same thing is, “Why shall I surrender?” But we have to surrender. That is our constitutional position. If I don’t surrender to some particular person or particular government or particular community or society or something, but ultimately I am surrendered. I am surrendered to the laws of nature. There is no independence. I have to surrender. When there is call of the cruel hands of death, immediately I have to surrender. So many things. So we should understand… This is brahma–jijñāsā, that “Why there is the surrendering process?” If I don’t like to surrender, then I am forced to surrender. In the state also, if I don’t mean to abide by the laws of the state, the state obliges me to surrender by police force, by military force, by so many things. Similarly, I don’t want to die, but death forces me to surrender. I don’t want to become old man, but nature forces me to become old. I don’t want any disease, but nature forces me to accept some sort of disease. So this surrendering process is there. Now we have to understand why this is so. That means my constitutional position is to surrender, but the present difficulty is that I’m surrendering to a wrong person. When we understand that I should surrender to the Supreme Lord, then my constitutional position is revived. That is my liberty.
Continue reading
Srila Prabhupada glorifies Srila Vrindavana dasa Thakura
Loading...
Loading...
Submitted by Yasoda nandana Dasa
Reporter: Now can you explain to me, I have some background information about the Kṛṣṇa consciousness society, but I don’t know how to explain it in relation to the broad word Hinduism. Now how do you relate the International Society for Krishna Consciousness to Hinduism? How would you describe it, as a part of Hinduism?Srila Prabhupāda: No. Hinduism practically we do not recognize because this word “Hinduism” is not mentioned in any Vedic literature. It is a foreign term. The Muhammadans, they called the inhabitants of India as “Hindus.” From that word, it is has come to “Hinduism.” Otherwise, we don’t find that word in any Vedic literature. “Hinduism” is a foreign term, it is not a Vedic term.Reporter: Yes. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness, its Vedic literature, they have some of the same books or also holy books for what we call Hindu religions, aren’t they?Srila Prabhupāda: Yes. Just try to understand, the inhabitants of India were called by the Muhammadans from Persia and other places, “Hindus.” “Hindus” means the resident on the other side of the River Indus. You have heard the name of River Indus. So they cannot pronounce it Indus, they say “Hindus.” From “Hindus,” it has become “Hindu.” So actually the residents of India were called “Hindus.” And generally, at least in, say, three thousand years ago, all the inhabitants of India were strictly followers of Vedic principles. After the advent of Lord Buddha, a different religious system developed. Otherwise, before Lord Buddha, there was all the… Not only in India, in other parts of the world. They were followers of Vedic principles. So in that sense, you can say if followers of Vedic principles are called Hindus, then before Lord Buddha, everyone was Hindu all over the world. Not that particular part of India. So far we have got historical reference from Mahābhārata, Indo-European stock, they are also Hindus, the so-called Hindus, followers of Vedic principles. Yes. Gradually, they deviated. Just like recently there is division of Pakistan and India. Twenty years before, this Pakistan was part of India. Now, these Muhammadans, they did not come from outside. They changed their faith from Hindus to Muhammadans. Now they divided their property. Similarly, actually the whole planet was called Bhārata–varṣa. Gradually, people deviated from Vedic principles or imitated something else and they became different.
Reload document 
Open in new tab